There’s been speculation of forming a One World government recently with all the troubles facing the world. In Particular, this article from Financial Times columnist Gideon Rachman. In response to this, people have flamed him for his article – and understandably, here’s why.
Financial Times columnist Gideon Rachman complains that he has been “covered in Internet slime” after receiving hundreds of hostile e-mails in response to his article in which he all but called for a dictatorial global government to be installed to fight terrorism, climate change and solve the financial crisis.
Gideon Rachman didn’t really give a good excuse for a Global Government in his aricle. Why do we need one? why do they want one? What the positive things of one world gov would be – no more war, equal oportunity, fair trade, end to famine, nuclear, biological & chemical weapons.
It’s these things above that the One world government would actually solve – and I think that The powers that be (tptb) are actually scared of it because it takes their current power away. And this is why they write these articles because they know the mid-west- radio talk show heartland will object to it to no end and cite Hitler and Stalin as examples of how it would be abused and in turn create a prison planet.
When in fact, if you think about it, it would prevent all the other hitlers and stalins from emerging by way of world co-operation and an end to such separation of nations that no nation would ‘need’ another Stalin or Hitler necause no ‘problems’ will be created.
If there is no problem then there needs to be no ’solution’. And I’m talking here in direct reference to the ‘Final Solution’ that Hitler proposed to create the master race – this was funded by the Bush Family and idealised by the Rockerfeller Family. This would not be needed if countries and people lived in harmony. People are more the same than they are different – society is what makes people different and a society that thrives on inequality
One hurdlle tptb are trying to overcome is Americas right to bear arms – they are trying to take it away and they know Americans will fight to protect that right. So it’s is why America is being set up to fail catastrophically financially with the CDS bubble. However, Imagine 100 years of one world gov where there has been no wars, or inequality, famine or terrorism – why would people need guns? Creating equal opportunity (which is not communism but giving “oportinity” to poorer people in the form of education, housing, food, worldwide etc) There’s no money I hear you say? Well, end war tomorrow, then you have enough money to do the above 10 times over.
The powers that be have also tried to get the one world government in by engineering/allowing to happen false flag events (terrorist, financial and ecological) in order to achieve their goal and this is unacceptable. i.e they create the problem, they then get the reaction they need from the people, then they come in with a solution – one of which is the one world government.
I have nothing against the OWG just so long as the current ptb are not in charge of it. If they obtain it by deception (which they ARE doing) then the OWG will be a deceptive organisation – and that will not happen unless they do it by force. This then becomes a dictatorship which going from history, is a road to ruin – people are correct to object to it currently because of the potential police state that would be created from it.
They need to market this not by doing editorials in FT. They need to demonstrate it first by getting rid of inequality, famine, war, nuclear weapons and armies in order to demonstrate the good intention. These actions would pay for themselves 100 times over.
The world will then know peace and we will all be one family automatically – the OWG would be just a formality.
Religion is, to a certain extent, is getting in the way of this process too because Religion is the single biggest creator of war ans separation. Try googling “single biggest cause of war” to see the stuff that comes up. This is not to say that there is no God or that Jesus or Mohamed (pbom), Moses, or Buddha or that never existed (they did – and do exist) and talked about riotous things.
No, ‘Orgsnisations’ that have flourished and monopolised these teachings (religions) have held societies to ransom over their interpretation of these teachings through preying on the primordial fear of death and wether you go to or hell through ones actions. To do this they have created rules and regulations that must be adhered to but more importantly, these rules and regulations are quite different from other religions so, by default, every other religion is committing a sin and is wrong and they’re all going to hell when they die so there’s no need to give them any respect.
The key thing here is that the differences of them has facilitated the fear of them, and fear leads to anger, and anger leads to war. The Masters Instead of separating people, they did the one thing that all of the above teachers were renowned for – “bringing people together”.
If all the above teachers came back to earth today and held a meeting to decide which of the following was correct:
1. “Religion brings the world together”
2. “Religion separates people of the world”
What do you think their answer would be?
And there will you find the truth and the truth of the one world government concept. The answer lies in you and it’s in you that these things can change through letting people know- including your politicians local councillors andyour religious leaders your feelings on this.
As an analogy, yesterday I went for a coffee at my local cafe – the cashier knew me from previous days and asked if I’d like “the usual?”
“Yes please ” I replied
She assumed I wanted a small cappuccino when I really wanted a large Latte – and only realised when I was halfway down the road…
So don’t assume your leaders know your feelings and what you want – they don’t
Tell them exactly what you want, today!
